– Ipoh Timor MP Howard Lee

If you do not get the irony in Lee’s rejoinder to Syed Saddiq Syed, you eventually will.

A couple of points need to be made. The DAP should stop sounding like the Cosa Nostra whenever they respond to criticism, no matter how vitriolic the criticisms are.

I assumed that said support was based on the fact that DAP knew Syed Saddiq was innocent of those charges or that the charges were possibly politically motivated much like those against DAP national chairperson Lim Guan Eng.

Does DAP’s help come with attachments? Does DAP supporting someone mean that no criticism can be levelled against them, especially when it comes to issues of national interest?

I get that this plays well with the base but to rational Malaysians, it does not. National interest trumps loyalty.

DAP secretary-general Anthony Loke reminding Syed Saddiq that he owes his Muar win to DAP merely seals the reputation among right-thinking Malaysians that the party is some sort of political cult.

The enthusiastic welcome Ahmad Zahid Hamidi received after the pyrrhic victory of the just concluded Johor by-elections is an example of how DAP would welcome the most toxic of partners but disavows those comrades past and present who actually stick to the principles DAP claims it has.

No matter, as long as the base continues to accept this kind of craven political play, DAP will thrive.

Indeed, whenever former members or allies level criticisms against DAP, they are always reminded how much DAP has done for them and how they were nobodies before joining DAP.

Where’s ‘lapdog’ denial?

All this, of course, is lapped up by the base and this is how DAP escapes accountability, either relying on the loyalty narrative or deflecting to other issues perpetrated by the mainstream Malay establishment.

Missing from the responses by those like Lee is exactly how the DAP is not a lapdog to Zahid, to Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, or to the Malay power brokers attempting to cling on to power by using this unity government.

If someone calls you a lapdog, you should in theory be able to put forward a rational argument about how you are not a lapdog, instead of saying the person who made the statements owes you loyalty.

Forget about all of that for a moment. DAP has bigger problems. This means rational-thinking Malaysians have bigger problems too. What Zahid’s case has proven and the acceptance of an alleged kleptocrat, is that DAP is willing to cross red lines when it comes to issues like corruption and public accountability.

What this demonstrates to Anwar and his loyalists in PKR is that the non-Malay base will put up with anything, even ridiculous excuses, to justify the continued existence of this non-reformist government.

What this Madani government is doing is slowly attempting to replicate BN-era politics. DAP with its near total support from the non-Malays, conceding ground to Malay power brokers using the spectre of a greater evil – the “Green Wave” – to shore up support even while engaging in the most craven of political manoeuvring and intellectually bankrupt policy-making was the role of the MCA during the long Umno watch.

MCA 2.0 and more

Umno, through the old maverick, instituted an Islamisation policy that redefined a whole generation of Malaysians and planted the seeds, the fruits of which PAS is reaping today.

MCA and the pragmatism of the non-Malays enabled this process, all the while securing victories from Umno even though the country was going down the manure hole, as DAP accurately pointed out at that time.

Of course, this Umno/BN style politics was easier back in the day when Umno commanded the majority of the Malay vote.

PAS willingly played the part of the big bad wolf and splinter Umno groups that did not stand a chance against the Machiavellian political plays of the old maverick.

Times have changed and so has technology. This new breed of ethno-theocrats has no problem slaying Malay sacred cows and goading the state to sanction them all in full view of the majority Malay polity.

DAP does not have the luxury as the MCA did of merely relying on economic security to balance the Islamisation of their Malay “partners”.

What we have is a virulent opposition relying on institutions of the state to propagate their theocratic ideas coupled with a ruling coalition which is struggling not only with economic issues brought upon by the mismanagement of the mainstream establishment but also a prime minister who struggles to connect with the Malay polity.

Furthermore, DAP has a history of coupling with far-right Malay power brokers who eventually betray them when they are back on terra firma political ground.

To increase his Islamic credentials, the current prime minister is doing everything within his power to project an Islamic agenda which is nearly the same as the opposition’s while attempting to placate his non-Malay supporters.

DAP, which claims to be a secular party, now has to endorse the Islamic diktats of the Madani government to prove they can work with Malay partners which is the main propaganda used against them by Perikatan Nasional.

The fact is, DAP working with Malay power brokers has increased funding to the religious bureaucracy. It has gone to great lengths to demonstrate to the Malay polity that they will not only dress up for the religious occasion but also throw secularism under the bus if it helps their Malay partners remain in power.

Furthermore, by embracing Umno wholeheartedly, cronyism, feudalism, and all the other political tools Umno used will be prolonged in an attempt to maintain power. These tools are anathema to reform.

However, because DAP has not maintained the secular line and embraced kleptocratic personalities merely to sustain this government, all this does is enable the excesses of its Malay partners, while scaring the base with the “Green Wave”.

DAP is not merely following in the footsteps of MCA but charting new ground. This does not help the Madani government but rather PN.

Malaysiakini columnist Mariam Mokhtar wrote something extremely perceptive in her last piece. This is a great point:

“Former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad openly announces what he wants for Malaysia, however disagreeable that may be. (Former prime minister) Muhyiddin Yassin is a Malay-first-and-Malaysian-second politician and his policies will reflect his stance. We know that (PAS president Abdul) Hadi (Awang)’s end goal is an Islamic state. These men are predictable.”

Harapan supporters are always asking for solutions. Don’t they know what the solutions are? Don’t they vote for people whose solutions align with their own? You don’t see PN supporters whining about their leaders not providing them with solutions, do you?

Now that this Madani government understands its vote bank will accept the crossing of any red lines, it also understands they can now carry out nearly any policy and the vote bank would accept it.

The trap for the non-Malays is that it is a great comfort attempting to replicate BN-era/social contract politics.

This kind of power-sharing is ultimately a suicide pact. – MKINI

Its information chief Haziq Azfar Ishak said this is because Muda won the Muar seat on the back of support from Pakatan Harapan.

“His victory in Muar was not on his personal capacity or Muda as a third force, but because Muda was in an electoral pact with Harapan.

“His failure to vacate the seat would be an act of stealing the Muar Parliament seat by becoming a third force as well as a betrayal of the people’s mandate, which chose Muda due to the electoral pact with Harapan,” Haziq said in a statement today.

Syed Saddiq announced today that he will quit the government bloc in Parliament, to become a third force – meaning he would not join Perikatan Nasional.

The decision was relayed to Dewan Rakyat speaker Johari Abdul.

The move did not trigger the anti-hopping law as Muda contested on its own ticket instead of a Harapan one.

Haziq, in justifying his call for Syed Saddiq to vacate the Muar seat, cited the case of Umno veteran Shahrir Samad.

In 1988, after being sacked from Umno, Shahrir resigned as Johor Bahru MP, triggering a by-election which he then won as an independent.

“Syed Saddiq is urged to do the same,” the PKR Youth leader said.

In 1990 – two years after Shahrir’s actions – the then-government amended the Federal Constitution to bar MPs who resigned from their seats from contesting an election for five years.

However, this rule was removed last year as part of anti-hopping reforms.

Muda to support reform bills

Muda decided to pull support from the government – thereby leaving Putrajaya one seat short of a two-thirds majority – in protest against prosecutors withdrawing corruption charges against Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi.

However, Muda will support the government when reform bills are tabled in the Dewan Rakyat and need two-thirds support to pass.

Meanwhile, an Amanah Youth leader voiced a dissenting opinion to that of PKR Youth on the Muar seat matter.

For Amanah Youth exco member Fadhli Umar Aminolhuda, it was enough that Syed Saddiq was no longer on the government bloc.

“No more by-elections!” he exclaimed, adding that youths were tired of politicking and power struggles. MKINI

MKINI

.