AVOID THE TRUTH AT YOUR PERIL – THE BREAKING POINT IS NOT FAR: IT’S A LOSE-LOSE FOR MALAYA BUT A WIN-WIN FOR SABAH & SARAWAK TO LEAVE MALAYSIA – IF OVERZEALOUS MUSLIM & MALAY-HEGEMONY PARTIES REFUSE TO GIVE & TAKE, LIVE & LET LIVE – AND IF ISMAIL SABRI’S GOVT REFUSES TO HONOUR THE NEWLY-MINTED MOU TO FULFIL MA63 PLEDGES! AND ONCE BROKEN, THE FEDERATION OF MALAYSIA CAN NEVER BE STUCK BACK TOGETHER AGAIN – JUST LIKE THE SINGAPOREANS, SABAHANS & SARAWAKIANS MAY DECIDE THE GRASS IS GREENER ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE PASTURE!

Where is the Federation of Malaysia heading?

HAPPY Malaysia Day! Based on feedback, it would appear that the movement for independence for Sarawak and Sabah is gathering momentum.

It would need to be nipped in the bud soon. Some analysts may see Malaysia heading for a break-up in future if certain core issues are not addressed properly.

A major reason is the perception, rightly or wrongly, that Semanjung has been unfairly exploiting Sabah and Sarawak, especially their natural resources, for the past 58 years.

Another important reason may be the perceived greater Islamisation pushed by some Muslim leaders from a Semanjung party, PAS (which is part of the Federal Government now), which Sarawak and Sabah may not feel comfortable with, whatever the assurances given by the some ministers.

In the light of the feelings in Sarawak and Sabah – of uneasiness, injustice and perhaps even anger of being betrayed – political leaders from Semanjung will need to be more sensitive and do more.

The federal government will need to give whatever that is due to Sarawak and Sabah, as agreed under MA63 and any subsequent agreements, on the management of their natural resources, especially oil and gas.

Before I continue on the sensitive subject of Islamisation, please allow me to state that I am a friend of Islam, especially the oppressed Muslims, having fought for the cause of the Palestinians for the past 35 years, since my student days in UK.

When our former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad spoke at the 10th Summit of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation in October 2003, about the disproportionate and negative influence and control of the Zionists in the West, he was severely condemned by the Western media of being an anti-Semitic.

No one came to his defence, maybe because he was just about to retire then. I wrote two large articles, which were published in a local paper and foreign press (Asian Wall Street Journal) to defend him, explain what anti-Semitism and Zionism were all about and why Dr Mahathir was not being anti-Semitic at all in his speech.

I was also perhaps, the only Malaysian who wrote at least four full-page press articles in the English and Malay press in 2016 and 2017 to defend Islam and expose and condemn the then US president Donald Trump for his rabidly anti-Muslim policies and actions.

I also explained about the origins and root causes of Islamophobia and how Muslim and non-Muslim leaders should deal with it.

Sarawak and Sabah, which have been rightly seen by many observers to be models for multiracial harmony, appear to be acting as kind of checks and balances against any forms of religious extremism from Semanjung.

Therefore, some overzealous Muslim leaders may not even mind Sabah and Sarawak breaking off later, because they may think that, without Sarawak and Sabah as ‘obstacles’ to their plans, they would be able to turn Semanjung into a full Islamic state with the implementation of strict shariah law, including hudud.

If this were to happen, it may turn Semanjung into a failed state with no or little economic development, based on what have happened to other Muslim majority countries that have taken such a road.

As an independent Malaysian analyst who has studied the development of other Muslim countries and who has the right to comment on the direction in which our multi-religious country may be heading, I would like to advise my Muslim compatriots to take the moderate road of progressive Islam rather than the more conservative Islam, which was good and suitable at the time of Prophet Muhammad and for much of the period after him, but it may not be so suitable today.

This is due to the current realities of the world that we live in, such as regional competition, growth of multiculturalism, globalisation, geopolitics and the need for all races to be and to feel united and work together in our multi-religious country to face the internal and more importantly, external challenges.

We sink or swim together as a nation with no help from others. So, we had better learnt how to live peacefully and harmoniously with each other.

Greater Islamisation, such as the implementation of hudud, in our multicultural country, if not handled carefully, can be divisive, and may be perceived to impinge on the rights and liberties of the other religions.

It may make the non-Muslims in Sarawak and Sabah feel threatened, despite assurances given by some federal politicians from Semanjung.

It would be a ‘lose-lose’ situation for both Muslims and non-Muslims in Semanjung if Sabah and Sarawak were to break off, even legally and peacefully later on, as Singapore did in 1965.

Some of the more conservative Muslims (whom I respect even if I disagree with them) may say that it is fine to have a failed state with little economic development, as their emphasis would be on the Thereafter, so whatever suffering the Muslims may have to endure in the Hereafter is less important.

Expressing objectively with good will, I would like to advise my Muslim compatriots, for the sake of their own well-being, to take the road of progressive Islam and recognise the importance of material economic development and eradicating poverty in the Hereafter, together with the continuation of religious education and the promotion of moral values and ethics as well.

It would be a win-win for all Muslims and other religious practitioners.

Our first three Muslim prime ministers were practising a lot of progressive Islam and Malaysian Muslims should follow the path set by our founding fathers. TMI

MOU a hope to fulfil MA63 pledges, says Guan Eng

THE government must keep to its pledges for the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) as the country celebrates the 58th Malaysia Day, said DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng.

According to Lim, the memorandum of understanding (MOU) signed by Prime Minister Ismail Sabri Yaakob and Pakatan Harapan (PH) party heads on Monday will also work for MA63. 

“PH is willing to work with the five ministers in the steering committee overseeing the implementation of the MOU to see how we can fulfil the pledges and promises of Malaysia Day 58 years ago,” Lim said.

The Bagan MP said MA63 was one of the key clauses of the MOU for political transformation and stability. 

In Parliament yesterday, other peninsular MPs also called on parties to take MA63 seriously for the East Malaysian states’ development.

Today, Lim asked for the restoration of the constitutional status of Sarawak, Sabah and Peninsular Malaysia.

He said the constitutional amendment will ensure that the unique lives and lifestyles of a diverse Malaysia, respecting all cultures and religions, is protected and preserved.

“This has assumed importance following growing concerns that PAS ministers in the federal government are proposing shariah laws that appear to jeopardise the fundamental rights of freedom of religion of non-Muslims,” Lim said.

He also requested the government recognise the autonomy of Sabah and Sarawak and not impose the same rules applied to Peninsular Malaysia.

Lim said that the economic development of Malaysian Borneo must be brought to parity with West Malaysia.

“Both states should always enjoy the largest share of federal government development funds as well as have a say in how they are distributed.

“Decentralisation should be adopted to ensure that decisions that impact on both states are not decided by officials in their air-conditioned offices thousands of kilometres away,” Lim said. TMI

THE MALAYSIAN INSIGHT

.