YOU ATTACK ROSMAH, I ATTACK YOU: CRUDE & VULGAR, NAJIB’S TOP SPINNER DECLARES WAR ON ‘CHINESE & INDIAN-RUN’ MALAYSIAKINI OVER AMBIGA-CLARE BROWN ARTICLE

Remember when Lim Guan Eng announced that Penang is a not a Taliban state and that is why they allow beer festivals? Is that not an insult to Islam? All Muslims who do not fook prostitutes, drink and gamble are bad people as far as Guan Eng is concerned while Muslims who fook prostitutes, drink and gamble are good people.

Malaysiakini’s editorial (SEE BELOW) written by those Indian and Chinese who are running that pro-Pakatan Harapan portal reeks of hypocrisy. It stinks to high heavens just like a finger that has been stuck up their lubang taik the whole day.

Suddenly Malaysiakini is moralising about the decent thing to do and the indecent thing one must not do. They are just like prostitutes preaching that there should be no extramarital sex or sex before marriage.

If the fire is too hot then get out of the kitchen. It is okay for them to slander and vilify others but when they receive what they dish out to others they suddenly talk about upbringing and all that sort of nonsense. This is war and all is fair in love and war, in case they have never heard that saying before.

It is okay to attack a woman if she is Malay-Muslim but not if she is Indian-Hindu

The last people who should be moralising would be that Indian and Chinese boss of Malaysiakini. They have been slandering and vilifying others for 18 years and suddenly they scream about the rules of the game. What fooking rules? Those who live by the sword must die by the sword. Why suddenly there are sacred cows just because the person happens to be a Hindu, Indian woman. Are you saying if the person is a Hindu, Indian woman like Ambiga we must talk to her nicely but if she is a Muslim, Malay woman like Rosmah we can attack her kaw-kaw?

Remember when Lim Guan Eng announced that Penang is a not a Taliban state and that is why they allow beer festivals? Is that not an insult to Islam? All Muslims who do not fook prostitutes, drink and gamble are bad people as far as Guan Eng is concerned while Muslims who fook prostitutes, drink and gamble are good people.

If in India such a remark would have resulted in bloodshed. The Muslims in India would have slaughtered people like Guan Eng by pancung kepala. Lucky you are in Malaysia where Malays are too docile and are not like the Indians in India.

Pakatan Harapan and people like Ambiga, Guan Eng, Lim Kit Siang, and many more oppose RUU355. Who the fook are you to interfere in Islamic affairs? The Sharia has been around since 1,400 years, long before you Indians and Chinese came to Malaya. Then we Malays allowed you citizenship in 1957 and suddenly, 60 years later, you decide you have the power and authority to dictate to Muslims how Islam should be practiced and whether the Sharia should be allowed or not.

Pakatan Harapan, especially the non-Muslim DAP people, are dictating how Islam should be practiced

Then you declare that Malaysia is a Secular State. Who turned Malaysia into a Secular State? Was it Parliament? When was that declaration made because the last I checked the Federal Constitution of Malaysia said no such thing? Is this what Pakatan Harapan is going to do if they happen to win the next general election and form the next federal government? If so then say so. Then Malays will know what they are going to get if Pakatan Harapan comes to power.

A Secular State means the state cannot interfere in matters concerning religion. A Secular State means men and men can get married. A Secular State means men and men can bonk each other and they will not get arrested and get sent to jail. A Secular State means Muslims can drink and they will not get arrested and get sent to jail. A Secular State means Muslim men and women can participate in orgies and can bonk each other without getting married and they will not get arrested and get sent to jail. A Secular State means Muslims can leave Islam and become an atheist or become a Christian and they will not get arrested and get sent to jail.

Abdul Hadi Awang has been my Tok Guru for 40 years since 1977 so you slander and vilify him at your own peril

That and many more are what a Secular State is all about. Is this what is happening in Malaysia? So does that make Malaysia a Secular State? Pakatan Harapan is lying to the people by telling them that Malaysia is a Secular State and that is why Malaysians must oppose RUU355 when that is not true. In Islam a jihad can be declared against Pakatan Harapan, and all those who smear Islam can be put to death.

They wish you would disbelieve as they disbelieved so you would be alike. So do not take from among them allies until they emigrate for the cause of Allah. But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them and take not from among them any ally or helper.” Quran (4:89)

The babble of bullies

Malaysiakini

It is universal knowledge that a person of impeccable upbringing will guard his tongue; his lips will not utter filth. The contrary is true of a person who has had undisciplined upbringing, however erudite that person may be.

A person who knows how to guard the tongue is really wise, but that cannot be said of a person who has not the ability to control the tongue.

An insane person knows not what he is talking. No one should bother about an insane’s person sheer babbling as the innate ability to think no longer dwells in him or her.

Blogger Raja Petra Kamarudin who hides in London is in this category, having insulted former Bar Council chairperson Ambiga Sreenevasan and Indian women in a most degrading manner. His gutter language reveals his guttersnipe attitude.

On the other hand if he is indeed sane and is driven by other motives to insult Ambiga, it is not strange either that those who resort to such foul language are bankrupt with ideas to debate or reason, hence they rely on their habitual lowly vulgarity.

Ambiga and Clare Brown ganging up on Hadi Awang

Aside from this, locally there are calls for Ambiga to confirm what had been stated in a London suit brought against Sarawak Report editor’s Clare Rewcastle-Brown by PAS leader Abdul Hadi Awang.

Those who clamour for the information Ambiga is alleged to have disclosed conveniently ignore the fact that it is legally wrong for a potential witness in a pending case to discuss or elaborate as to what had been disclosed in a pleading and which could be an issue at the trial.

How did these people who are after Ambiga fail to observe this simple legal norm? Is it a political vendetta? Or is it sheer bullying? Those who indulge in this unsavoury kind of activity bring shame to Malaysia, and its people.

Raja Petra Kamarudin

– http://www.malaysia-today.net

.